Article Text
Abstract
The death toll from tobacco is staggering: it might contribute to one billion premature deaths over the course of the 21st century. In ‘The case for banning cigarettes’, Kalle Grill and Kristin Voigt argue that the well-being and equality benefits of a complete ban on cigarettes more than justify the restrictions on autonomy that such a ban would impose. Their argument depends on two crucial simplifications: an assumption that the ban would be effective and the restriction of the analysis to a comparison with the status quo, rather than a broader range of policy options. I argue that despite the authors’ claims, these two simplifications make it impossible for their argument to ‘bring into focus the fundamental normative issues’ surrounding a possible cigarette ban, since they dramatically overstate the benefits and obscure the most significant costs of such a ban.
- Ethics
- Autonomy
- Substance Abusers/Users of Controlled Substances
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter Follow Mathieu Doucet @WM_Doucet
Funding Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Development Grant).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The case for banning cigarettes
- Attitudes of smokers towards tobacco control policies: findings from the Studying Tobacco users of Pakistan (STOP) survey
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Systematic review of health and behavioural outcomes of smoking cessation interventions in prisons
- Prison tobacco control policies and deaths from smoking in United States prisons: population based retrospective analysis
- FCTC followed by accelerated implementation of tobacco advertising bans
- The economics of tobacco: myths and realities
- Trends in home smoking bans in the USA, 1995–2007: prevalence, discrepancies and disparities
- Impact of workplace smoke-free policy on secondhand smoke exposure from cigarettes and exposure to secondhand heated tobacco product aerosol during COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: the JACSIS 2020 study
- Secondhand smoke exposure and support for smoke-free policies in cities and rural areas of China from 2009 to 2015: a population-based cohort study (the ITC China Survey)