Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is medically assisted death a special obligation?
  1. Eduardo Rivera-López1,2
  1. 1Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Av. Figueroa Alcorta 7350, CABA, Argentina
  2. 2CONICET, Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, Argentina
  1. Correspondence to Professor Eduardo Rivera-López, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Av. Figueroa Alcorta, CABA 7350, Argentina;


Several distinct arguments conclude that terminally ill patients have a right to a medically assisted death; two are especially influential: the autonomy argument and the non-harm argument. Both have proven convincing to many, but not to those who view the duty not to kill as an (almost) absolute constraint. Some philosophers see the source of such a constraint in general (deontological) moral principles, other in the nature of the medical profession. My aim in this paper is not to add one further argument in favour of medically assisted death. Rather, I want to shed light on a kind of reason that, to my mind, has not been previously highlighted or defended, and that might shake the principled conviction that doctors are never allowed to actively assist their patients to die. Specifically, my purpose is to show that doctors (as members of the medical profession) have a special duty to provide medically assisted death to consenting terminally ill patients, because (and insofar as) they have been participants in the process leading to the situation in which a patient can reasonably ask to die. In some specific ways (to be explained), they are involved in the tragic fate of those patients and, therefore, are not morally allowed to straightforwardly refuse to assist them to die.

  • Euthanasia
  • Philosophical Ethics

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Ken Boyd

Other content recommended for you