Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Neutralising fair credit: factors that influence unethical authorship practices
- Correspondence to Dr Barton Moffatt, Department of Philosophy and Religion, Mississippi State University, PO Box JS, Mississippi State, MS 59761, USA; brm157{at}msstate.edu
Citation
Neutralising fair credit: factors that influence unethical authorship practices
Publication history
- Received March 16, 2016
- Revised November 22, 2016
- Accepted January 11, 2017
- First published January 31, 2017.
Online issue publication
May 26, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (31 January 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students
- Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
- The fraud squad
- Most cases of research misconduct go undetected, conference told
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation
- UK must learn from US's mistakes in tackling research misconduct
- How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
- Misconduct in research: editors respond