Article info
PDFCorrection
Correction: Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
Citation
Correction: Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
Publication history
- First published December 1, 2016.
Online issue publication
April 25, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 April 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
- Response to: ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’ by Lawlor
- How to select a biosimilar
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- CRISPR immunity: a case study for justified somatic genetic modification?
- Mental disorder ethics: theory and empirical investigation
- Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
- New-media arts-based public engagement projects could reshape the future of the generative biology
- Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?