Article Text
Abstract
Background The field of bioethics is constantly evolving. To investigate trends in the field of bioethics, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the top-cited articles in bioethical journals over the past 40 years.
Methods Retrospective quantitative study of the 20 most cited bioethics articles published each year from 1975 to 2014 were conducted. Article samples were selected from a list of the most relevant 100 journals in the field of bioethics.
Results In total, 800 top-cited articles between 1975 and 2014 in the domain of bioethics were retrieved and analysed. More than half of them were composed by single authors, but multiauthorship became more prevalent with time. The majority (84.5%) of these highly cited articles originated from the USA (65.3%), UK or Canada, though the proportion of other countries increased in recent years. Almost half (44.6%) of the highly cited articles belonged to the subfield of clinical ethics, but other subfields such as research ethics, public health ethics and neuroethics became more prominent. Overall, the distribution of Thesaurus keywords and subfields became more diverse over time, and the number of journals publishing top-cited articles doubled. Furthermore, the empirical ethics approach increased over time in our sample of top-cited articles.
Conclusions In sum, the forefront of bioethics is getting more diversified, collaborative and international. The presumed ‘mainstream’ becomes less dominant over time, as more highly cited articles come from new subfields, discuss new topics, use more Bioethics Thesaurus keywords, more authors participate and more countries other than the USA contribute to bioethics journals.
- Ethics
- History of Health Ethics/Bioethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Authorship policies of bioethics journals
- Measuring an individual researcher ’s impact: new directions and challenges
- Time variation of some selected topics in bioethical publications
- Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
- Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation - based evaluative metrics make (pseudo) honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article
- The 100 most cited articles in the endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms
- Nature, content and shifts over time of the most impactful unruptured intracranial aneurysms articles: a bibliometric analysis
- 100 most - cited articles on diabetic retinopathy
- Top - cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores
- Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training