Objectives To determine the role played by law in medical specialists' decision-making about withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults who lack capacity, and the extent to which legal knowledge affects whether law is followed.
Design Cross-sectional postal survey of medical specialists.
Setting The two largest Australian states by population.
Participants 649 medical specialists from seven specialties most likely to be involved in end-of-life decision-making in the acute setting.
Main outcome measures Compliance with law and the impact of legal knowledge on compliance.
Results 649 medical specialists (of 2104 potential participants) completed the survey (response rate 31%). Responses to a hypothetical scenario found a potential low rate of legal compliance, 32% (95% CI 28% to 36%). Knowledge of the law and legal compliance were associated: within compliers, 86% (95% CI 83% to 91%) had specific knowledge of the relevant aspect of the law, compared with 60% (95% CI 55% to 65%) within non-compliers. However, the reasons medical specialists gave for making decisions did not vary according to legal knowledge.
Conclusions Medical specialists prioritise patient-related clinical factors over law when confronted with a scenario where legal compliance is inconsistent with what they believe is clinically indicated. Although legally knowledgeable specialists were more likely to comply with the law, compliance in the scenario was not motivated by an intention to follow law. Ethical considerations (which are different from, but often align with, law) are suggested as a more important influence in clinical decision-making. More education and training of doctors is needed to demonstrate the role, relevance and utility of law in end-of-life care.
- Care of the Dying Patient
- Living Wills/Advance Directives
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations in health professionals’ knowledge of end-of-life law: a cross-sectional survey
- Clinical issues on consent: some philosophical concerns
- Cross-sectional survey of Good Samaritan behaviour by physicians in North Carolina
- Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- How can the criminal law support the provision of quality in healthcare?
- Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
- Advance directives and end-of-life decisions in Switzerland: role of patients, relatives and health professionals
- Nurse-led patient-centred intervention to increase written advance directives for outpatients in early-stage palliative care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an embedded explanatory qualitative study
- Readiness for legally literate medical practice? Student perceptions of their undergraduate medico-legal education