You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 43, Issue 5
  • Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings

Share

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentary
Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.

del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo

Email this article to a friend

We will not keep your email address; we ask for it so your friend knows the email isn't spam.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Medical Ethics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of Medical Ethics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you