Article Text
Clinical ethics
Paper
Should healthcare professionals sometimes allow harm? The case of self-injury
Abstract
This paper considers the ethical justification for the use of harm minimisation approaches with individuals who self-injure. While the general issues concerning harm minimisation have been widely debated, there has been only limited consideration of the ethical issues raised by allowing people to continue injuring themselves as part of an agreed therapeutic programme. I will argue that harm minimisation should be supported on the basis that it results in an overall reduction in harm when compared with more traditional ways of dealing with self-injurious behaviour. It will be argued that this is an example of a situation where healthcare professionals sometimes have a moral obligation to allow harm to come to their patients.
- Autonomy
- Clinical Ethics
- Psychiatry
- Paternalism
- Coercion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings
- Harm minimisation for self-harm: a cross-sectional survey of British clinicians’ perspectives and practises
- Retrospective analysis of reported suicide deaths and attempts on veterans health administration campuses and inpatient units
- Threats and offers in community mental healthcare
- David Oliver: The risks of discharging patients early against doctors’ judgment
- Self-harm in immigration detention: political, not (just) medical
- Hospital admissions for self harm after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care: cohort study
- Longer term management of self harm: summary of NICE guidance
- Antidepressant treatment and the risk of fatal and non-fatal self harm in first episode depression: nested case-control study
- Medical involvement in torture today?