Article Text
Abstract
This paper considers the ethical justification for the use of harm minimisation approaches with individuals who self-injure. While the general issues concerning harm minimisation have been widely debated, there has been only limited consideration of the ethical issues raised by allowing people to continue injuring themselves as part of an agreed therapeutic programme. I will argue that harm minimisation should be supported on the basis that it results in an overall reduction in harm when compared with more traditional ways of dealing with self-injurious behaviour. It will be argued that this is an example of a situation where healthcare professionals sometimes have a moral obligation to allow harm to come to their patients.
- Autonomy
- Clinical Ethics
- Psychiatry
- Paternalism
- Coercion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sometimes, not always, not never: a response to Pickard and Pearce
- Balancing costs and benefits: a clinical perspective does not support a harm minimisation approach for self-injury outside of community settings
- Retrospective analysis of reported suicide deaths and attempts on veterans health administration campuses and inpatient units
- Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)
- Beyond antidoping and harm minimisation: a stakeholder - corporate social responsibility approach to drug control for sport
- Withholding treatment: What, Whom and Why
- Face - down restraint has no place in modern mental health settings
- Multilevel population - based cross-sectional study examining school substance - misuse policy and the use of cannabis, mephedrone and novel psychoactive substances among students aged 11–16 years in schools in Wales
- A strategy to reduce illicit drug use is effective in elite Australian football
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground