Article Text
Abstract
Background This article deals with arguments that challenge the possibility of an ethical justification for a doping ban.
Hypothesis/purpose It shows that a justification for the doping ban is only possible if its implementation can be safeguarded.
Study design Systematic review.
Methods Based on the proposition of the game theory, this article examines the scope of the arguments of naturalness, health, equal opportunity and fairness used in scientific literature.
Results/conclusions Ceteris paribus, athletes will always prefer a situation that presents no health risk to a situation in which they face a threat to their health. They will therefore consent to a doping ban on the condition that it is ensured that all parties are bound to this rule, so that anyone complying with the rules will not be afraid of losing the competition as a result. For even if we condoned self-harm, it could still be argued plausibly that the individual should not suffer more disadvantages than absolutely necessary for the sake of gaining an advantage over others. Of course, it is possible to plead for a restricted approval of doping measures with acceptable risk. But even taking minor risks would not seem sensible under the condition that all participants without exception adhere to the same conditions when there is the option to renounce the (avoidable) risks. So as far as the use of performance-enhancing substances or methods is concerned, we can maintain that even if minor health risks are to be expected, a ban on doping can be justified from an ethical point of view.
- Ethics
- Philosophical Ethics
- Substance Abusers/Users of Controlled Substances
- Regulation
- Enhancement
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Other content recommended for you
- Recreational and ergogenic substance use and substance use disorders in elite athletes: a narrative review
- Sport specialisation and performance-enhancing substance use by young athletes
- Glucocorticoids in elite sport: current status, controversies and innovative management strategies—a narrative review
- Ethics of a relaxed antidoping rule accompanied by harm-reduction measures
- The case for and against harm reduction approaches to drugs in sport
- Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019)
- Addict to win? A different approach to doping
- Gene doping: an overview and current implications for athletes
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update