Article Text
Doping in sport
The case for and against harm reduction approaches to drugs in sport
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding CLF leads the Culture and Values in Health research programme at the Centre for Cultural Diversity and Wellbeing, and is a research affiliate of the Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University. He has received research funding from the Australian NHMRC, ARC, philanthropic bodies, and federal and state governments.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Doping in sport
- Doping in sport
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Time for change: a roadmap to guide the implementation of the World Anti-Doping Code 2015
- Addict to win? A different approach to doping
- Globalisation of anti-doping: the reverse side of the medal
- Ethics of a relaxed antidoping rule accompanied by harm-reduction measures
- Drug use in English professional football
- Would they dope? Revisiting the Goldman dilemma
- Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport
- Challenges and threats to implementing the fight against doping in sport
- Beyond antidoping and harm minimisation: a stakeholder-corporate social responsibility approach to drug control for sport
- FIFA’s approach to doping in football