Article Text
Abstract
Unit 731, a biological warfare research organisation that operated under the authority of the Imperial Japanese Army in the 1930s and 1940s, conducted brutal experiments on thousands of unconsenting subjects. Because of the US interest in the data from these experiments, the perpetrators were not prosecuted and the atrocities are still relatively undiscussed. What counts as meaningful moral repair in this case—what should perpetrators and collaborator communities do decades later? We argue for three non-ideal but realistic forms of moral repair: (1) a national policy in Japan against human experimentation without appropriate informed and voluntary consent; (2) the establishment of a memorial to the victims of Unit 731; and (3) US disclosure about its use of Unit 731 data and an apology for failing to hold the perpetrators accountable.
- Chemical and Biological Weapons
- Codes of/Position Statements on Professional Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Author meets critics: responses
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Science for evil: the scientist's dilemma
- The promise and perils of Unit 731 data to advance COVID-19 research
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes
- Psychological implications of chemical and biological weapons
- Fighting biological warfare
- Biological warfare and bioterrorism
- Epidemiological data on health of military personnel participating in the UK’s chemical defence programme
- Undergraduate teaching on biological weapons and bioterrorism at medical schools in the UK and the Republic of Ireland: results of a cross-sectional study
- Plague Wars