Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Torture and Genocide
- Applied and Professional Ethics
- Codes of/Position Statements on Professional Ethics
Complicity consists in one person contributing to someone else's wrongdoing. But there is a diverse cluster ways of being involved in another’s wrongdoing. For a ‘diagnosis by exclusion’, we first fix the meaning of complicity in contrast to that with which it is often wrongly conflated.
Literally cooperating in wrongdoing with others, for instance, is more than complicity. Each and every cooperator is actually a co-principal in the wrong jointly committed; and each bears the full responsibility, shared with all co-principals, for the outcomes of that wrongdoing.
Other sorts of involvement with wrongs committed by others amount to less than complicity because the involvement there is causally inert and hence does not actually contribute to the other’s wrongdoing at all. Pardoning wrongs wholly in the past may be like that. So too may be some cases of wilfully overlooking wrongs that others commit under one's very nose.
Complicity is a very precise way of being involved in wrongdoing. Complicity consists in a secondary contribution of a causal (or potentially causal) sort to a wrong committed by someone else. That ‘contribution factor’ can be graded on many axes, in terms of how proximate, reversible or frequent the contribution was. Other things being equal, one is more complicit the …
Twitter Follow Chiara Lepora at @kiaralep
Contributors REG and CL equally contributed to conception of the work, drafting the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
- Author meets critics: responses
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prolonged immigration detention, complicity and boycotts
- On complicity and compromise: a reply
- Ethical considerations on the complicity of psychologists and scientists in torture
- Complicity and torture
- Is the international regulation of medical complicity with torture largely window dressing? The case of Israel and the lessons of a 12-year medical ethical appeal
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- ‘He who helps the guilty, shares the crime’? INGOs, moral narcissism and complicity in wrongdoing
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Should medical ethics justify violence?