Article info

Download PDFPDF
The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law

Authors

  1. Correspondence to John Olusegun Adenitire, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge. Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge CB3 0DG, UK; joa22{at}cam.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Adenitire JO
The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law

Publication history

  • Received November 4, 2015
  • Revised February 5, 2016
  • Accepted February 25, 2016
  • First published March 18, 2016.
Online issue publication 
March 22, 2017

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you