The Swedish solution to the legal handling of professional conscientious refusal in healthcare is described. No legal right to conscientious refusal for any profession or class of professional tasks exists in Sweden, regardless of the religious or moral background of the objection. The background of this can be found in strong convictions about the importance of public service provision and related civic duties, and ideals about rule of law, equality and non-discrimination. Employee's requests to change work tasks are handled on a case-by-case basis within the frames of labour law, ensuring full voluntariness, and also employer's privilege regarding the organisation and direction of work, and duties of public institutions to provide services. Two complicating aspects of this solution related to the inclusion of ‘alternative medical’ service providers in a national health service, and professional insistence on conscientious refusal rights to accept legalised assisted dying are discussed. The latter is found to undermine the pragmatic reasons behind recent attempts by prolife groups to challenge the Swedish solution related to legal abortion in courts.
- Conscientious Objection
- Suicide/Assisted Suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
- Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey