Article info
PDFResponse
Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- Correspondence to Professor Jocelyn Maclure, Pavillon Félix-Antoine- Savard, 532, Université Laval, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6; jocelyn.maclure{at}fp.ulaval.ca
Citation
Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
Publication history
- Received August 24, 2016
- Accepted September 6, 2016
- First published September 28, 2016.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson