Responses
Law, ethics and medicine
Paper
Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 18 July 2017
- Published on: 18 July 2017Is it conscientious objection at all?
This is a thought provoking paper but I wonder if it is founded on a false premise. It strikes me that a conscientious objection only applies if the surgeon has an obligation to undertake a cosmetic surgery procedure. If there is no obligation they are simply declining to carry out the procedure. Presumably this may be because the surgeon decides the procedure is not in the best interests of the patient. Since the surgeon is primarily an expert in physical, bodily function they should base their judgement of best interest on those grounds. Of course, if this reasoning is sound, fewer cosmetic procedures should perhaps be performed than currently are.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Mistakes and missed opportunities regarding cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
- Cosmetic surgeries and procedures among youth in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate university students in the Eastern Province
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Changes to bodily appearance: the aesthetics of deliberate intervention
- The pursuit of beauty: the enforcement of aesthetics or a freely adopted lifestyle?
- Should all advertising of cosmetic surgery be banned? Yes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Surgeons set new standards for cosmetic treatments