In this paper, I analyse the issue of conscientious objection in relation to cosmetic surgery. I consider cases of doctors who might refuse to perform a cosmetic treatment because: (1) the treatment aims at achieving a goal which is not in the traditional scope of cosmetic surgery; (2) the motivation of the patient to undergo the surgery is considered trivial; (3) the patient wants to use the surgery to promote moral or political values that conflict with the doctor's ones; (4) the patient requires an intervention that would benefit himself/herself, but could damage society at large.
- Conscientious Objection
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Mistakes and missed opportunities regarding cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
- Cosmetic surgeries and procedures among youth in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate university students in the Eastern Province
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Changes to bodily appearance: the aesthetics of deliberate intervention
- The pursuit of beauty: the enforcement of aesthetics or a freely adopted lifestyle?
- Should all advertising of cosmetic surgery be banned? Yes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Surgeons set new standards for cosmetic treatments