Article Text
Law, ethics and medicine
Paper
Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
Abstract
In this paper, I analyse the issue of conscientious objection in relation to cosmetic surgery. I consider cases of doctors who might refuse to perform a cosmetic treatment because: (1) the treatment aims at achieving a goal which is not in the traditional scope of cosmetic surgery; (2) the motivation of the patient to undergo the surgery is considered trivial; (3) the patient wants to use the surgery to promote moral or political values that conflict with the doctor's ones; (4) the patient requires an intervention that would benefit himself/herself, but could damage society at large.
- Conscientious Objection
- Enhancement
- Surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Mistakes and missed opportunities regarding cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection
- Cosmetic surgeries and procedures among youth in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate university students in the Eastern Province
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Changes to bodily appearance: the aesthetics of deliberate intervention
- The pursuit of beauty: the enforcement of aesthetics or a freely adopted lifestyle?
- Should all advertising of cosmetic surgery be banned? Yes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Surgeons set new standards for cosmetic treatments