Article Text
Abstract
Although some healthcare professionals have the legal right to conscientiously object to authorise or perform certain lawful medical services, they have an associated duty to provide the patient with enough information to seek out another professional willing to authorise or provide the service (the ‘duty to refer’). Does the duty to refer morally undermine the professional's conscientious objection (CO)? I narrow my discussion to the National Health Service in Britain, and the case of a general practitioner (GP) being asked by a pregnant woman to authorise an abortion. I will be careful not to enter the debate about whether abortion should be legalised, or the debate about whether CO should be permitted—I will take both as given. I defend the objecting GP's duty to refer against those I call the ‘conscience absolutists’, who would claim that if a state is serious enough in permitting the GP's objection in the first place (as is the UK), then it has to recognise the right to withhold any information about abortion.
- Conscientious Objection
- Abortion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Australian pharmacists ’ perspectives on physician - assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- Barriers and facilitators of access to first - trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review
- Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings
- Patients ’ use and experiences with e-consultation and other digital health services with their general practitioner in Norway: results from an online survey
- A response to critics: weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation