Article info
PDFCommentary
Response to commentaries: ‘Further clarity on cooperation and morality’
- Correspondence to Professor David S Oderberg, Department of Philosophy, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AA, UK; d.s.oderberg{at}reading.ac.uk
Citation
Response to commentaries: ‘Further clarity on cooperation and morality’
Publication history
- Received January 23, 2017
- Accepted January 30, 2017
- First published March 9, 2017.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals