Article info
PDFCommentary
Mere sincerity
- Correspondence to Professor SJ Edward Collins Vacek, Department of Religious Studies, Loyola University New Orleans, 6363 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70018, USA; evacek{at}loyno.edu
Citation
Mere sincerity
Publication history
- Received September 13, 2016
- Accepted September 27, 2016
- First published October 28, 2016.
Online issue publication
March 22, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 October 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- The Cohen problem of informed consent
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- A clear case for conscience in healthcare practice
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen