Incentive schemes, which offer recipients benefits if they meet particular requirements, are being used across the world to encourage healthier behaviours. From the perspective of equality, an important concern about such schemes is that since people often do not have equal opportunity to fulfil the stipulated conditions, incentives create opportunity for further unfair advantage. Are incentive schemes that are available only to disadvantaged groups less susceptible to such egalitarian concerns? While targeted schemes may at first glance seem well placed to help improve outcomes among disadvantaged groups and thus reduce inequalities, I argue in this paper that they are susceptible to significant problems. At the same time, incentive schemes may be less problematic when they operate in ways that differ from the ‘standard’ incentive mechanism; I discuss three such mechanisms.
- Distributive Justice
- Health Promotion
- Public Health Ethics
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Which strings attached: ethical considerations for selecting appropriate conditionalities in conditional cash transfer programmes
- Health incentive research and social justice: does the risk of long term harms to systematically disadvantaged groups bear consideration?
- Incentives, equity and the Able Chooser Problem
- Effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on infant up-to-date and timely vaccination
- Incentivising safe sex: a randomised trial of conditional cash transfers for HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Tanzania
- Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?
- NAITRE study on the impact of conditional cash transfer on poor pregnancy outcomes in underprivileged women: protocol for a nationwide pragmatic cluster-randomised superiority clinical trial in France
- Does it work to pay people to live healthier lives?
- Effect of a home-based health, nutrition and responsive stimulation intervention and conditional cash transfers on child development and growth: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Tanzania
- Do cash transfer programmes yield better health in the first year of life? A systematic review linking low-income/middle-income and high-income contexts