Citation Tools
PDFBenefits to participants
Paper
Why high-risk, non-expected-utility-maximising gambles can be rational and beneficial: the case of HIV cure studies
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Why high-risk, non-expected-utility-maximising gambles can be rational and beneficial: the case of HIV cure studies
Other content recommended for you
- Patients, doctors and risk attitudes
- The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation
- Quality-adjusted life years
- Developing a dementia-specific preference-based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol
- Rationality of irrationality: preference catering or shaping?
- Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis
- Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best–worst scaling survey
- Measuring the benefits of growth hormone therapy in children: a role for preference-based approaches?
- Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study
- Utility values associated with blindness in an adult population