The exposure of doctors, nurses and other medical professionals to risks in the context of epidemics is significant. While traditional medical ethics offers the thought that these dangers may limit the extent to which a duty to care is applicable in such situations, it has less to say about what we might owe to medical professionals who are disadvantaged in these contexts. Luck egalitarianism, a responsibility-sensitive theory of distributive justice, appears to fare particularly badly in that regard. If we want to maintain that medical professionals are responsible for their decisions to help, cure and care for the vulnerable, luck egalitarianism seems to imply that their claim of justice to medical attention in case of infection is weak or non-existent. The article demonstrates how a recent interpretation of luck egalitarianism offers a solution to this problem. Redefining luck egalitarianism as concerned with responsibility for creating disadvantages, rather than for incurring disadvantage as such, makes it possible to maintain that medical professionals are responsible for their choices and that those infected because of their choice to help fight epidemics have a full claim of justice to medical attention.
- Allocation of Health Care Resources
- Political Philosophy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors Both authors have contributed, in equal proportion, to the drafting, writing and development of this article.
Funding Carlsberg Foundation CF14-0896.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Going above and beneath the call of duty: the luck egalitarian claims of healthcare heroes, and the accomodation of professionally-motivated treatment refusal
- Solidarity, justice and unconditional access to healthcare
- Just health responsibility
- Feiring's concept of forward-looking responsibility: a dead end for responsibility in healthcare
- Introduction: Special Issue on the Ethics of Incentives in Healthcare
- You cannot have your normal functioning cake and eat it too