Article Text
Abstract
In their recent paper‘Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008’, Mngadi et al conclude that a participant in an HIV prevention study who deliberately concealed her pregnancy was not ‘unduly induced’ to participate by the offer of an experimental product. This paper argues that while the authors’ conclusion is sound, the framing of this case study is consistent with the preoccupation in research ethics with the concept of undue inducement, coupled with a highly risk-averse attitude to pregnancy (regardless of whether those risks may be willingly assumed by pregnant women themselves). We suggest that the critical research ethics question raised by Mngadi et al’s case study is not ‘undue inducement’, but the exclusion of pregnant women from research studies where the risks are acceptable to the potential participant, and benefits likely. We also suggest that current regulatory paradigms regarding pregnancy are both overly paternalistic and value the fetus over the mother. In order to ensure timely provision of new HIV prevention agents, we argue that there is a need for expeditious testing of proven effective agents in pregnancy, with due consideration given to situations where preliminary efficacy data exist but fall short of licensure standards. This requires a paradigm shift from researchers, funders, regulators and ethical review bodies towards practices that critically examine the legitimacy of the exclusion of pregnant women on a study-by-study basis.
- Hiv Infection And Aids
- Research Ethics
- Reproductive Medicine
- Paternalism
- Coercion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors BGH conceived and drafted the article. MOF reviewed and revised the article for content and style, and made substantial contributions.
Competing interests BGH was the ethicist on the CAPRISA 008 Data Safety Monitoring Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Clinical ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008
- Ethics of medical care and clinical research: a qualitative study of principal investigators in biomedical HIV prevention research
- Contraception use and impact on pregnancy prevention in women participating in an HIV prevention trial in South Africa
- Developing ethics guidance for HIV prevention research: the HIV Prevention Trials Network approach
- Combination adherence strategy to support HIV antiretroviral therapy and pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence during pregnancy and breastfeeding: protocol for a pair of pilot randomised trials
- The challenge of defining standards of prevention in HIV prevention trials
- Contraception and prevention of HIV transmission: a potential conflict of public health principles
- Designing research in vulnerable populations: lessons from HIV prevention trials that stopped early
- Antiretroviral therapy for pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Caring for sex workers