Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Successful clinical trials are important for all of us, but they can be extremely complicated to design and run, so work must be done to consider what commonly goes wrong and how these issues can be addressed. Gelinas et al suggest an ethical argument for institutional prioritisation of clinical trials conducted among limited populations. This is to ensure successful recruitment and prevent competing trials rendering each other irrelevant through lack of statistical power. But they overlook the fact that effective prioritisation already occurs, and their suggestion produces yet another hurdle for researchers to overcome.
Their argument hinges around the claim that allocation of participants to trials represents an inevitable rationing scenario and, like all rationing scenarios, the best methods should be used for objectively determining how limited resources (participants) are distributed to achieve the end goal (successful clinical trials).1 Although they acknowledge that both individuals and clinicians may have preferences as to which trial a patient participates in, trial interventions are by definition experimental, and therefore choosing between trials is not really analogous to choosing between alternative clinical interventions. Here it seems that although clinical instinct is important when determining treatment options, a clinical trial is a specific attempt to create systematic justified knowledge and thus individual patient/clinician autonomy …
Linked Articles
Other content recommended for you
- Institutions as an ethical locus of research prioritisation
- When clinical trials compete: prioritising study recruitment
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise
- Inequalities in full vaccination coverage based on maternal education and wealth quintiles among children aged 12–23 months: further analysis of national cross-sectional surveys of six South Asian countries
- A review and analysis of accountability in global health funding, research collaborations and training: towards conceptual clarity and better practice
- Principal component analysis of socioeconomic factors and their association with malaria and arbovirus risk in Tanzania: a sensitivity analysis
- Complex relationship between household wealth, location of residence, road crash injury incidence and injury severity in Uganda
- Relationship between popularity and the likely efficacy: an observational study based on a random selection on top-ranked physical activity apps
- Are the poorest poor being left behind? Estimating global inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health
- Use of a deep learning and random forest approach to track changes in the predictive nature of socioeconomic drivers of under-5 mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa