Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In their essay, ‘When Clinical Trials Compete: Prioritizing Study Recruitment’, Gelinas et al describe a collective action problem that can arise if multiple trials at a single institution are all trying to recruit participants from the same patient population. Each trial may be addressing an important question, and each will need a certain number of participants to provide an informative answer (or to maximise the likelihood of producing an informative result). But because these trials are all recruiting from the same population, it is possible that there will not be enough participants to go around. It may turn out, then, that none successfully achieves its target sample size and all end up being uninformative or less informative than hoped.
As Gelinas et al observe, these kinds of uninformative or less-informative trials are ethically problematic, since they fail to fully redeem participant risks and burdens with adequate gains in generalisable knowledge. Such trials also represent wasteful or inefficient research activities, since each necessarily has a human and material cost, but then fails to offset these costs by providing a definitive answer to the research …
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Institutions as an ethical locus of research prioritisation
- When clinical trials compete: prioritising study recruitment
- Am I my brother’s gatekeeper? Professional ethics and the prioritisation of healthcare
- Target and actual sample sizes for studies from two trial registries from 1999 to 2020: an observational study
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- Ethical implications of excessive cluster sizes in cluster randomised trials
- Risk, double effect and the social benefit requirement
- Reporting of and explanations for under-recruitment and over-recruitment in pragmatic trials: a secondary analysis of a database of primary trial reports published from 2014 to 2019
- Controlled human infection with SARS-CoV-2 to study COVID-19 vaccines and treatments: bioethics in Utopia
- The social value of candidate HIV cures: actualism versus possibilism