Article info
PDFCommentary
The limits of research institutions in setting research priorities
- Correspondence to Dr Joseph Millum, Clinical Center Department of Bioethics/Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, 10/1C118, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; millumj{at}cc.nih.gov
Citation
The limits of research institutions in setting research priorities
Publication history
- Received December 4, 2016
- Accepted January 19, 2017
- First published February 8, 2017.
Online issue publication
November 23, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 February 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision - making of clinical commissioning groups in England
- Access to intensive care unit beds for neurosurgery patients: a qualitative case study
- On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors
- Medical ethics
- Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities
- Research priority setting in childhood chronic disease: a systematic review
- Priority setting for new systematic reviews: processes and lessons learned in three regions in Africa
- Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia / James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership