Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paper
A medical curriculum in transition: audit and student perspective of undergraduate teaching of ethics and professionalism
  1. Toni C Saad1,
  2. Stephen Riley2,
  3. Richard Hain3
  1. 1 Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2 Cardiff University School of Medicine, Dean of Medical Education, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3 Consultant and Clinical Lead, Wales Managed Clinical Network in Paediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Toni C Saad, Cardiff University School of Medicine, UHW Main Building, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK; tonisaad1{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction The General Medical Council (GMC) stipulates that doctors must be competent professionals, not merely scholars and practitioners. Medical school curricula should enable students to develop professional values and competencies. Additionally, medical schools are moving towards integrated undergraduate curricula, Cardiff's C21 being one such example.

Methods We carried out an audit to determine the extent to which C21 delivers GMC professionalism competencies, and a student questionnaire to explore student perspective on ethics and professionalism.

Results and discussion C21 delivers explicit or implicit teaching for all major GMC competencies, though some missed opportunities remain. The questionnaire responses showed that most students value ethics and professionalism teaching, and that it is most well received when delivered in a variety of ways and contexts throughout the curriculum. We also note that some respondents confuse ethics and professionalism with the policing of student behaviour.

Conclusions C21 and curricula like it offer many opportunities for nurturing ethically and professionally competent physicians. Students appear to value this, though there remains confusion between medical school discipline and ethics and professionalism which needs further explication.

  • Education for Health Care Professionals
  • Education/Programs

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter Follow Stephen Riley @RilesinWales

  • Contributors All three authors made substantial contributions to this work, with regard to its design, enactment and interpretation, and redrafting.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval The School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee approved this study on 29 April 2015.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.