Understanding why individuals opt out of living donation is crucial to enhancing protections for all living donors and to identify modifiable barriers to donation. We developed an ethical approach to conducting research on individuals who opted out of living kidney donation and applied it in a small-scale qualitative study at one US transplant centre. The seven study participants (64% response rate) had varied reasons for opting out, the most prominent of which was concern about the financial burden from lost wages during the postoperative period. Several reported feeling alone during their decision-making process. Although no participants used an alibi, a centre-provided statement of non-eligibility to donate, all believed that centres should offer alibis to help preserve donor autonomy. Given the complexity of participants' decisions and the emotions they experienced before and after deciding not to donate, we suggest approaches for independent living donor advocates to support this population. This study demonstrates that research on individuals who opt out of donation is feasible and yields valuable insight into methods to improve the evaluation experience for potential living donors.
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors CT and SK developed the study protocol. MJ assisted with participant recruitment. CT and ZJ conducted the interviews and performed the qualitative data analysis. CT wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MJ, PR, EJG, PZ and SK contributed to the interpretation of the data and edited drafts of the manuscript. All coauthors gave final approval for the work to be published.
Funding The Section of Organ Transplantation and Immunology at the Yale School of Medicine funded this research.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Yale School of Medicine's institutional review board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Opting out: confidentiality and availability of an ‘alibi’ for potential living kidney donors in the USA
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Live liver donation, ethics and practitioners: ‘I am between the two and if I do not feel comfortable about this situation, I cannot proceed’
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- Self-interest, self-abnegation and self-esteem: towards a new moral economy of non-directed kidney donation
- Kidneys on demand
- Towards a standardised informed consent procedure for live donor nephrectomy: the PRINCE (Process of Informed Consent Evaluation) project—study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study
- Understanding barriers and outcomes of unspecified (non-directed altruistic) kidney donation from both professional’s and patient’s perspectives: research protocol for a national multicentre mixed-methods prospective cohort study
- Allowing autonomous agents freedom
- Socioeconomic deprivation and barriers to live-donor kidney transplantation: a qualitative study of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients