We argue that the mandatory moral bioenhancement of psychopaths is justified as a prescription of social morality. Moral bioenhancement is legitimate when it is justified on the basis of the reasons of the recipients. Psychopaths expect and prefer that the agents with whom they interact do not have certain psychopathic traits. Particularly, they have reasons to require the moral bioenhancement of psychopaths with whom they must cooperate. By adopting a public reason and a Kantian argument, we conclude that we can justify to a psychopath being the recipient of mandatory moral bioenhancement because he has a reason to require the application of this prescription to other psychopaths.
- Behaviour Modification
- Moral Psychology
- Philosophical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Is moral bioenhancement dangerous?
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning
- NICE guidelines, clinical practice and antisocial personality disorder: the ethical implications of ontological uncertainty
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy