This article addresses whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and sustained physiological support should ever be permitted in individuals who are diagnosed as brain dead and who had held previously expressed moral or religious objections to the currently accepted criteria for such a determination. It contrasts how requests for care would normally be treated in cases involving a brain-dead individual with previously expressed wishes to donate and a similarly diagnosed individual with previously expressed beliefs that did not conform to a brain-based conception of death. The paper first focuses narrowly on requests for CPR and then expands its scope to address extended physiological support. It describes how refusing the brain-dead non-donor's requests for either CPR or extended support would represent enduring harm to the antemortem or previously autonomous individual by negating their beliefs and self-identity. The paper subsequently discusses potential implications of policy that would allow greater accommodations to those with conscientious objections to currently accepted brain-based death criteria, such as for cost, insurance, higher brain formulations and bedside communication. The conclusion is that granting wider latitude to personal conceptions around the definition of death, rather than forcing a contested definition on those with valid moral and religious objections, would benefit both individuals and society.
- Patient perspective
- Definition/Determination of Death
- Human Dignity
- Moral and Religious Aspects
- Attitudes Toward Death
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Death and organ donation: back to the future
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors
- Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Heart surgery and transplantation: innovations impacting on concepts of life and death
- Waiting for a miracle or best medical practice? End-of-life medical ethical dilemmas in Bahrain
- Proceeding with clinical trials of animal to human organ transplantation: a way out of the dilemma