Freedom of Information Act: scalpel or just a sharp knife?
The concluding statement of the Burns Commission, established to evaluate whether changes are needed to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), ruled no major legislative changes were required. As such Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation still enables anyone to obtain information from public authorities. In this brief report article we explore arguments regarding FOI as an instrument for healthcare research using an international research programme as a case study.
- Research Ethics
- Public Law
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- E-therapies in England for stress, anxiety or depression: what is being used in the NHS? A survey of mental health services
- Utilisation of the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant in NHS Trusts and Clinical Commissioning Groups across England: a freedom of information investigation
- Cross-sectional survey of orthotic service provision in the UK: does where you live affect the service you receive?
- UK perspective on the changing landscape of non-invasive cardiac testing
- Prevalence of electronic screening for sepsis in National Health Service acute hospitals in England
- Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
- How are declarations of interest working? A cross-sectional study in declarations of interest in healthcare practice in Scotland and England in 2020/2021
- The UK Freedom of Information Act (2000) in healthcare research: a systematic review
- Hospital autopsy: Endangered or extinct?
- NHS joint working with industry is out of public sight