This article develops a civic republican approach to medical ethics. It outlines civic republican concerns about the domination that arises from subjection to an arbitrary power of interference, while suggesting republican remedies to such domination in healthcare. These include proposals for greater review, challenge and pre-authorisation of medical power. It extends this analysis by providing a civic republican account of assistive arbitrary power, showing how it can create similar problems within both formal and informal relationships of care, and offering strategies for tackling it. Two important objections to civic republican medical ethics—that it overvalues independence and political participation in healthcare—are also considered and rebutted.
- Philosophical Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Knowledge, attitude and practice of community-dwelling adults regarding advance care planning in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study
- Gender, mental health and resilience in armed conflict: listening to life stories of internally displaced women in Colombia
- Characterisation of social support following incarceration among black sexual minority men and transgender women in the HPTN 061 cohort study
- Whatever happened to medical politics?
- Harmful rights-doing? The perceived problem of liberal paradigms and public health
- Informal caregivers and advance care planning: systematic review with qualitative meta-synthesis
- Perspective of geriatric patients on advance care planning in Denmark: a qualitative study
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Dignitarian medical ethics