Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: responses
Guantanamo and Other Cases of Enforced Medical Treatment-A Biopolitical Analysis
- Correspondence to Dr Mirko Daniel Garasic Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; mdgarasic{at}fulbrightmail.org
Citation
Guantanamo and Other Cases of Enforced Medical Treatment-A Biopolitical Analysis
Publication history
- Received March 20, 2016
- Accepted March 31, 2016
- First published April 19, 2016.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- The Israeli abortion committees' process of decision making: an ethical analysis
- Autonomy and negatively informed consent
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Concepts of “person” and “liberty,” and their implications to our fading notions of autonomy
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views
- The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy
- The physician and prison hunger strikes: reflecting on the experience in Turkey
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults