Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Commentary
A bar too high: why we should not bar parents from knowing the sex of their fetus
- Correspondence to Dr Dena S Davis, Religion Studies, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3075, USA; dsd311{at}lehigh.edu
Citation
A bar too high: why we should not bar parents from knowing the sex of their fetus
Publication history
- Accepted December 30, 2015
- First published February 4, 2016.
Online issue publication
December 14, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 December 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus
- Why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus: a response to the commentaries
- Sex, lies and gender
- Sidestepping a trap: a commentary on ‘why parents should not be told the sex of their fetus’
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Is sex ratio at birth an appropriate measure of prenatal sex selection? Findings of a theoretical model and its application to India
- ‘The more we change, the more we remain the same’: female feticide continues unabated in India
- Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood