Article Text
Abstract
Dementia patients may express wishes that do not conform to or contradict earlier expressed preferences. Our understanding of the difference between their prior preferences and current wishes has important consequences for the way we deal with advance directives. Some bioethicists and gerontologists have argued that dementia patients change because they undergo a ‘response shift’. In this paper we question this assumption. We will show that proponents of the response shift use the term imprecisely and that response shift is not the right model to explain what happens to dementia patients. We propose a different explanation for the changed wishes of dementia patients and conclude that advance directives of dementia patients cannot be simply put aside.
- Dementia
- Decision-making
- Clinical Ethics
- Living Wills/Advance Directives
- Quality/Value of Life/Personhood
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- In-hospital dementia-related deaths following implementation of the national dementia plan: observational study of national death certificates from 1996 to 2016
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- A plea for end-of-life discussions with patients suffering from Huntington's disease: the role of the physician
- ‘Mrs A’: a controversial or extreme case?
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study
- Potentially preventable complications of urinary tract infections, pressure areas, pneumonia, and delirium in hospitalised dementia patients: retrospective cohort study
- Forget me not: palliative care for people with dementia