Article Text
Abstract
Clinical ethics has been developing in paediatric healthcare for several decades. However, information about how paediatricians use clinical ethics case consultation services is extremely limited. In this project, we analysed a large set of case records from the clinical ethics service of one paediatric hospital in Australia. We applied a paediatric-specific typology to the case referrals, based on the triadic doctor–patient–parent relationship. We reviewed the 184 cases referred to the service in the period 2005–2014, noting features including the type of case, the referring department(s) and the patient's age at referral. The two most common types of referral involved clinician uncertainty about the appropriate care pathway for the child (26% of total referrals) and situations where the child's parents disagreed with the doctors’ recommendations for the child's care (22% of total referrals). Referrals came from 28 different departments. Cancer, cardiology/cardiac surgery and general medicine referred the highest numbers of cases. The most common patient age groups were children under 1, and 14–15 years old. For three controversial areas of paediatric healthcare, clinicians had initiated processes of routine review of cases by the clinical ethics service. These insights into the way in which one very active paediatric clinical ethics service is used further our understanding of the work of paediatric clinical ethics, particularly the kinds of ethically challenging cases that paediatricians view as appropriate to refer for clinical ethics support.
- Paediatrics
- Clinical Ethics
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Paediatric clinical ethics in Australia and New Zealand: a survey
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations
- Ethics of fertility preservation for prepubertal children: should clinicians offer procedures where efficacy is largely unproven?
- Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services
- Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy
- Critical dialogue method of ethics consultation: making clinical ethics facilitation visible and accessible
- Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation
- The need for a clinical ethics service and its goals in a community healthcare service centre: a survey
- Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study