This response refutes the claim made in a recent article that organs for transplantation in China will no longer be sourced from executed prisoners. We identify ongoing ethical problems due to the lack of transparent data on current numbers of transplants in China; implausible and conflicting claims about voluntary donations; and obfuscation about who counts as a voluntary donor. The big unanswered question in Chinese transplant ethics is the source of organs, and until there is an open and independently audited system in China, legitimate concerns remain about organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience.
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- A matter of life or death: China moves towards changing its transplantation practices
- Engaging with China on organ transplantation
- China harvested organs from political prisoners on substantial scale, says tribunal
- Journals retract 15 Chinese transplantation studies over executed prisoner concerns
- Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparency
- Why journals should stop publishing transplantation research from China
- China to halt using executed prisoners’ organs for transplants: a step in the right direction in medical ethics
- China’s organ donation figures appear to be falsified, study claims