The Japanese government has asserted that the purpose of scientific activities is to search for the truth about the world and contribute to public interest of the humanities and claimed that research misconduct should occur under no circumstances ever. The revealing of each new case of research misconduct leads to the establishment of investigation committees and research guidelines, as well as punishments for the transgressors. However, we wonder if Japanese researchers are receiving different messages that might undermine the purpose of the former messages. First, Japan's policies on science and technology have been created to comprise an integration of merit-based evaluations, principles of competition and a concentrated and unbalanced distribution of research funding, leading to decreases in ordinary research funding for the researchers and an increase in fierce research competition. Second, Japanese government and society as a whole continue to send the researchers messages such as ‘Only results matter’, ‘Be No. 1 as a top priority’ and ‘All we need now is scientific progress’. Third, cultural peculiarities may explain some of the actions relevant to research misconducts currently noted in Japan. We argue that it is essential to re-examine and improve the governmental policies and evaluation methods for research achievements need to be more multifaceted. In order to have the researchers act according to ethics, it is essential for them to reaffirm their objectives for working in the fields of science and medicine and the importance of balancing their personal profit with the greater cause for entering into this field.
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Experience and awareness of research integrity among Japanese physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
- Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
- The fraud squad
- Scale of research misconduct is unknown because of poor reporting by universities, say MPs
- A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud
- Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress
- All stakeholders must commit to improving research integrity, medical editors tell MPs