Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Incidence, duration and cost of futile treatment in end-of-life hospital admissions to three Australian public-sector tertiary hospitals: a retrospective multicentre cohort study
- Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
- Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework
- Factors associated with non-beneficial treatments in end of life hospital admissions: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Australia
- Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians
- COVID-19 pandemic, the scarcity of medical resources, community-centred medicine and discrimination against persons with disabilities
- Study on factors inducing workplace violence in Chinese hospitals based on the broken window theory: a cross-sectional study
- The best interests of persistently vegetative patients: to die rather that to live?
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan