Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Disclosure of incidental constituents of psychotherapy as a moral obligation for psychiatrists and psychotherapists
- Correspondence to Dr Manuel Trachsel, Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zurich, Zurich 8032, Switzerland; manuel.trachsel{at}uzh.ch
Citation
Disclosure of incidental constituents of psychotherapy as a moral obligation for psychiatrists and psychotherapists
Publication history
- Received July 2, 2015
- Revised March 22, 2016
- Accepted April 18, 2016
- First published May 11, 2016.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 May 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism
- Rethinking paternalism: an exploration of responses to the Israel Patient 's Rights Act 1996
- “ I can put the medicine in his soup, Doctor! ”
- Medical paternalism in House M.D
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Psychotherapy, placebos, and informed consent
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- Psychotherapy is still failing patients: revisiting informed consent — a response to Garson Leder
- Individual patient data meta-analysis of combined treatments versus psychotherapy (with or without pill placebo), pharmacotherapy or pill placebo for adult depression: a protocol
- All you need is cognitive behaviour therapy