Article Text
Abstract
This paper examines the current state of right to refuse medical treatment in Turkey. Even though there are only a few studies carried out with Turkish physicians on their attitude towards the right to refuse treatment, I argue that recent studies on physicians’ views on informed consent and honest disclosure show that Turkish physicians do not tend to recognise their patients’ right to decline treatment. This is because the refusal of treatment crucially requires that patients be properly informed and asked for their consent before the treatment. Turkish physicians and healthcare providers’ tendency to ignore the right to decline medical treatment cannot be separated from their paternalistic approach to patients and their rights. I argue that part of the problem is the legal framework, which, in essence, is still paternalistic. More specifically, the frequent appearance of the phrase ‘medical necessity’ in the relevant legislation is conveniently used to justify medical intervention against a patient's will. I conclude the paper by proposing reforms in the legal documents defining and regulating patient rights, including the Constitution of the Turkish Republic, and I will argue that these reforms will help enhance patient rights in Turkey. Turkey has been discussing a new Constitution for the past several years, so my proposal should best be understood as contributing to public discussion of the new Constitution by initiating debate about medical paternalism and patient autonomy in Turkish medicine.
- Right to Refuse Treatment
- Paternalism
- Rights
- Autonomy
- Regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- Refusal rights, law and medical paternalism in Turkey
- The physician and prison hunger strikes: reflecting on the experience in Turkey
- The views of cancer patients on patient rights in the context of information and autonomy
- What do patients expect from their physicians? Qualitative research on the ethical aspects of patient statements
- Medical paternalism in House M.D.
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Grasping the nettle—what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B)
- A case study from the perspective of medical ethics: refusal of treatment in an ambulance
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?