Article Text
Asylum
Commentary
Torture, healthcare and Australian immigration detention
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter Follow Ryan Essex at @RyEssex
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Are healthcare professionals working in Australia 's immigration detention centres condoning torture
- Should clinicians boycott Australian immigration detention
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Prolonged immigration detention, complicity and boycotts
- Preventive detention: the ethical ground where politics and health meet. Focus on asylum seekers in Australia
- Nursing in asylum seeker detention in Australia: care, rights and witnessing
- Asylum seeking children and adolescents in Australian immigration detention on Nauru: a longitudinal cohort study
- Doctors should boycott working in Australia ’s immigration centres and must continue to speak out on mistreatment of detainees — despite the law
- Australian doctors refuse to discharge refugee girl into government detention
- Australian doctors face two years in jail for reporting asylum seekers ’ health