Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Medical involvement in torture today?
Citation
Medical involvement in torture today?
Publication history
- First published June 27, 2016.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2016
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Are healthcare professionals working in Australia's immigration detention centres condoning torture?
- Prolonged immigration detention, complicity and boycotts
- Ethical considerations on the complicity of psychologists and scientists in torture
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Is the international regulation of medical complicity with torture largely window dressing? The case of Israel and the lessons of a 12-year medical ethical appeal
- Preventive detention: the ethical ground where politics and health meet. Focus on asylum seekers in Australia
- The clinician and detention
- Doctors, interrogation, and torture
- The role of the pathologist in human rights abuses
- Detention is still harming children at the US border