While the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) remains controversial in ethical circles, it continues to be recognised in common law courts. In 2015, the High Court of New Zealand became the latest to acknowledge the existence of the DDE, in a case that challenged the prohibition on physician assisted dying. In so doing, the possibility was raised that the DDE could potentially be used in an untraditional way to provide a prima facie justification of “facilitated aid in dying” (FAID) in some cases.
In this article, we develop and offer justification for this line of reasoning. If it can be shown that FAID sometimes satisfies the conditions for DDE, this, we suggest, may have significant implications for the aid in dying debate, not only in New Zealand, but more widely. Even if all of the elements of the DDE are not met in such cases, though, we suggest that one of those elements – the doctor's intent in providing FAID – may not always be such as to attract moral blame or criminal culpability.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Editor's choice
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- A response to critics: weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Embryo loss and double effect
- Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnik: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patient-centred medical care
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care