Technological measures meant to change sexual orientation are, we have argued elsewhere, deeply alarming, even and indeed especially if they are safe and effective. Here we point out that this in part because they produce a distinctive kind of ‘clinical collective action problem’, a sort of dilemma for individual clinicians and researchers: a treatment which evidently relieves the suffering of particular patients, but in the process contributes to a practice that substantially worsens the conditions that produce this suffering in the first place. We argue that the role obligations of clinicians to relieve the suffering of their patients put them in a poor position to solve this problem, though they can take measures to avoid complicity in the harms that would result from widespread use of individually safe and effective reorientation biotechnology. But in the end the medical community as a whole still seems obligated to provide these measures, if they become technologically feasible. Medical researchers are in a better position to prevent the harms that would result if reorientation techniques were safe, effective and widely available. We argue that the harms attendant on the development of safe and effective re-orientation techniques give researchers reason to avoid ‘applied‘ research aimed at developing these techniques, and to be careful in the conduct of basic orientation research which might be applied in this way.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Inequities in tobacco advertising exposure among young adult sexual, racial and ethnic minorities: examining intersectionality of sexual orientation with race and ethnicity
- Gender identity and sexual orientation: a glossary
- Sexual health promotion for sexual and gender minorities in primary care: a scoping review protocol
- Sexual orientation and sex differences in socioeconomic status: a population-based investigation in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health
- Sexual orientation identity and tobacco and hazardous alcohol use: findings from a cross-sectional English population survey
- Family outcome disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual families: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Discrimination, identity connectedness and tobacco use in a sample of sexual and gender minority young adults
- Sexual minority population density and incidence of lung, colorectal and female breast cancer in California
- Sexual minority status and suicidal behaviour among Chinese adolescents: a nationally representative cross-sectional study
- Tobacco use among sexual minorities in the USA, 1987 to May 2007: a systematic review