Article info
PDFEditor's choice
Paper
Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
- Correspondence to Dr Ana S Iltis, Department of Philosophy and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA; iltisas{at}wfu.edu
Citation
Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
Publication history
- Received February 19, 2016
- Accepted April 18, 2016
- First published May 9, 2016.
Online issue publication
May 23, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 May 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Cell-free fetal DNA and RNA in maternal blood: implications for safer antenatal testing
- Women’s choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England
- Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Ethical considerations for choosing between possible models for using NIPD for aneuploidy detection
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access