Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Dalle Ave et al (2016) provide a valuable overview of several protocols for heart transplantation after circulatory death. However, their analysis of the compatibility of heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) with the dead donor rule (DDR) is flawed. Their permanence-based criteria for death, which depart substantially from established law and bioethics, are ad hoc and unfounded. Furthermore, their analysis is self-defeating, because it undercuts the central motivation for DDR as both a legal and a moral constraint, rendering the DDR vacuous and trivial. Rather than devise new and ad hoc criteria for death for the purpose of rendering DCD nominally consistent with DDR, we contend that the best approach is to explicitly abandon DDR.
- Dead donor rule
- Definition/Determination of Death
- Vital organ donation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Current controversy
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- An analysis of heart donation after circulatory determination of death
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Theological reflections on donation after circulatory death: the wisdom of Paul Ramsey and Moshe Feinstein
- Neonatal organ donation: has the time come?
- Critical care in the Emergency Department: organ donation
- Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- Exploring the use of high and low demand simulation for human performance assessment during multiorgan retrieval with the joint scrub practitioner
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications