Citation Tools
PDFMini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
Commentary
Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Other content recommended for you
- New tobacco and nicotine products in Latin America and the Caribbean: assessing the market and regulatory environment
- Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: the need for continued regulatory innovation
- Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review
- Electronic nicotine delivery system use behaviour and loss of autonomy among American Indians: results from an observational study
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘e-cigarette’ in the USA
- Prevalence and correlates of JUUL use among a national sample of youth and young adults
- Transitions between cigarette, ENDS and dual use in adults in the PATH study (waves 1–4): multistate transition modelling accounting for complex survey design
- Correlates of tobacco product initiation among youth and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)
- Initiation of any tobacco and five tobacco products across 3 years among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)