Citation Tools
PDFMini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
Commentary
Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Other content recommended for you
- Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use during smoking cessation: a qualitative study of 40 Oklahoma quitline callers
- Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review
- Ethics of tobacco harm reduction from a liberal perspective
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: the need for continued regulatory innovation
- Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan - sponsored quitlines
- Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)
- New Zealand tobacco retailers ’ understandings of and attitudes towards selling Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: a qualitative exploration
- Analysis of on - pack messages for e-liquids: a discrete choice study
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘ e - cigarette ’ in the USA
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda